On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 09:59:50AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Harvey,
>
> On Fri, 07 Nov 2008 09:43:57 -0800 Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Is it really fair to drop the v4l tree when it was -staging that broke? I'd humbly
> > suggest that staging be weighted somewhat lower than the other trees.
>
> There is no staging tree in linux-next, that driver is in Linus' tree. I
> agree that if there was a staging tree, it would be much lower priority.
>
> Maybe we need some way to exclude the staging directory from
> all{yes,mod}config builds ...
That is simple to do. Something like:
config STAGING_EXCLUDE_BUILD
bool "Exclude Staging from the build"
And test for this in the Staging Makefile
When this is set to 'y' then we will not build
the staging tree.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
