Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 07 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jens,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in
> block/elevator.c between commit 2920ebbd65f3e80c318adf5191ac0987142bda80
> ("block: add timer on blkdev_dequeue_request() not elv_next_request()")
> from Linus' tree and commit 8b3806453dd25d15a7ca7d537124af14ba8546bc
> ("blktrace: port to tracepoints") from the block tree.
> 
> Just a context change.  I fixed it up (see below) and assume it will be
> fixed in your tree soon.

Both of these merge errors will go away very shortly, since I'll rebase
for-next on master again due to the recent merge.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux