Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the slab tree got a conflict in
fs/proc/inode.c between commit 5bcd7ff9e1690dbdbccb2a1cb3c2ea8b8381c435
("proc: proc_init_inodecache() can't fail") from Linus' tree and commit
f7f650b4b85ad364072936db9e6beddcb2ca33b8 ("Filesystem: /proc filesystem
support for slab defrag") from the slab tree.
It is just a context change. I fixed it up (see below) and will carry the
fix for a couple of days (during which time it will hopefully be fixed in
your tree).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
diff --cc fs/proc/inode.c
index 2543fd0,54f8137..0000000
--- a/fs/proc/inode.c
+++ b/fs/proc/inode.c
@@@ -106,13 -106,22 +106,21 @@@ static void init_once(void *foo
inode_init_once(&ei->vfs_inode);
}
+ static void *proc_get_inodes(struct kmem_cache *s, int nr, void **v)
+ {
+ return fs_get_inodes(s, nr, v,
+ offsetof(struct proc_inode, vfs_inode));
+ };
+
-int __init proc_init_inodecache(void)
+void __init proc_init_inodecache(void)
{
proc_inode_cachep = kmem_cache_create("proc_inode_cache",
sizeof(struct proc_inode),
0, (SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT|
SLAB_MEM_SPREAD|SLAB_PANIC),
init_once);
+ kmem_cache_setup_defrag(proc_inode_cachep,
+ proc_get_inodes, kick_inodes);
- return 0;
}
static const struct super_operations proc_sops = {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
