On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 09:19:59 +0200 Or Gerlitz wrote: > Randy Dunlap wrote: > > Building with CONFIG_INFINIBAND=m, kconfig allows CONFIG_NET_9P_RDMA=m, > > so one module wants symbols from the other (net/9p wants symbols from rmda_*). > > > > ERROR: "rdma_destroy_id" [net/9p/9pnet_rdma.ko] undefined! > > ERROR: "rdma_connect" [net/9p/9pnet_rdma.ko] undefined! > > ... > > Is this supposed to be allowed/possible? Otherwise NET_9P_RDMA might have to depend on INFINBAND=y... > No, there's no need to config INFINIBAND at built it. What's the value > of CONFIG_INFINIBAND_ADDR_TRANS ? That should teach me to include the .config file. However, it's not difficult to recreate. CONFIG_INFINIBAND_ADDR_TRANS=n because it depends on INFINIBAND && INET, (INET being TCP/IP) which =n. NET_9P_RDMA depends on NET && NET_9P && INFINIBAND && EXPERIMENTAL, but this problem config has NET=y and INET=n. And NET != INET. So INFINIBAND_ADDR_TRANS could depend on NET instead of INET (maybe; I don't know what interfaces it really needs) or NET_9P_RDMA could depend on INET && <rest of list>. But I don't know which change makes the most sense, or if some other change does. HTH. config attached. --- ~Randy
Attachment:
config-rdma
Description: Binary data
