2008/10/23 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > > On Thu, 23 Oct 2008, Fr?d?ric Weisbecker wrote: >> >> But to let the core trace.c to be built for other types of tracing, >> the best thing I see is to put some ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS on the >> tracing_cpumask functions and structure, and actually on the creation >> of this file. > > Is there a reason that you use "raw_local_irq_disable" instead of > local_irq_disable? I'm not using anything :) This is about the tracing_cpumask debugfs file implemented in trace.c It's tracing_cpumask_write function uses the raw_local functions, I guess because its locking doesn't need to be traced. And the problem here is that some archs don't implement raw_local functions and so trace.c doesn't compile with alpha or m68k. But actually this file is not needed for them. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
