On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 07:25:50PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > Basically the above commit moved xfs_ilock() inside > > radix_tree_preload()/radix_tree_preload_end(), which means we are > > taking a rwsem() while we have an elevated preempt count. I'll > > get a patch out to fix it. This really needs a warning. Then again I don't really understand this as the point of radix_tree_preload was that we can do the actual radix-tree under a lock, or not? Anyway, the patch looks correct to me, including the slightly unrelated hunk to fix the missing unlock and preload leak. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
