From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 22:11:16 -0700 > On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 22:07:54 -0700 (PDT) David Miller wrote: > > > From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 22:01:42 -0700 > > > > > What's the expected modifier for "size_t" to work on all arches? > > > > Put "%Z" in front of the output specifier you want to use, > > for example %Zd for decimal and %Zx for hex. > > > > > Same goes for the result of "size_of()", what should we use there? Or > > > are we just required to always cast things? > > > > Sizeof should use the same as above. > > I know that Alan recently merged a patch with %Zd instead of %zd, > but the ANSI spec says to use %z, so I thought that we were going with > that moreso than %Z... ?? I think you're right. My old fingers must do %Z automatically because gcc a long time ago didn't recognize %z and warned. That should be such an old gcc problem as to be irrelevant these days. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
