On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 10:58:42AM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > Yes, the common ide-{disk,floppy}.c code resides now in ide-gd.c. > > > I got a bit harder after that ... so I have again dropped the bdev for > > today. > > This may be actually my fault since I remember Al asking me about some > conflicting > changes during KS/LPC? (though I later forgot about it). > > Al, is stuff in bdev-next going in during this merge window? If so > please push it > to Linus ASAP and I'll take care of fixing IDE patches. Otherwise I'm > going to push > IDE stuff to Linus and you'll have to fixup bdev-next. ;-) As the matter of fact, I've got bdev-next variant covering ide-gd, so if you can push the relevant ide patch(es) to Linus, bdev would be ready to go. Or I can push the mainline-based variant and send the pieces that affect ide-gd your way (basically, it's a matter of f_mode/f_flags stuff being touched in ide-gd instead of ide-floppy, converting your disk_ops->ioctl() to sane prototype and converting ide-gd.c to new bdev method prototypes). Up to you... Al, trying to order the VFS patch-pile into mergable shape right now... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html