Re: linux-next: build failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi all,

Today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this:

In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu-hash64.h:17,
                 from arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu.h:8,
                 from arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable.h:8,
                 from arch/powerpc/mm/slb.c:20:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h:76: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'memstart_addr'
arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h:77: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'kernstart_addr'

Caused by commit 600715dcdf567c86f8b2c6173fcfb4b873e25a19 ("generic: add
phys_addr_t for holding physical addresses") from the tip-core tree.
This only fails if CONFIG_RELOCATABLE is set.

I have applied the patch below.

applied to tip/core/urgent, thanks Stephen!

Shouldn't this go via a ppc tree? Won't having ppc changes in tip.git make people grumpy?

   J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux