On Fri, Sep 05 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in
> include/linux/bio.h and include/linux/blkdev.h between commit
> 81449f3f2013d92ec3bcb9d2c1877ce3140d2271 ("[SCSI] block: separate
> failfast into multiple bits") from the scsi tree and commit
> 5d112a624058caabe5b570d2c9827bce82c18be1 ("Add 'discard' request
> handling") from the block tree.
>
> Overlapping changes/additions to some bit definitions. I have fixed it
> up as best I can (see below) and can carry the fix.
James, would it not have been a lot better to carry the block bits in
the block tree instead??
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
