On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:37:17 -0400 (EDT) Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Thu, 4 Sep 2008, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:55:25 -0500 (EST) Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 9 Dec 2006, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > > > > On Sat, 09 Dec 2006 22:17:55 -0500 (EST) Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > > > > > > > Please consider what SND_CONFIG_AC97_BUS corresponds to. It is > > > > > sound/pci/ac97/ac97_bus.c and if you look into this file you'll see that > > > > > it is perfectly buildable even if sound is entirely configured out, just > > > > > like some lib code would be. > > > > > > > > OK. Should it (CONFIG_SND_AC97_BUS -> sound/pci/ac97/ac97_bus.c) > > > > be buildable when sound is disabled? > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > If so, where should it be moved to (since afaik, make won't even > > > > descend into sound/ if SOUND=n; I don't see that changing > > > > any time soon). > > > > > > What about this patch? > > > > Can we get this patch or some patch into the input tree for linux-next? > > This patch is commit e1036502e5263851259d147771226161e5ccc85a and > appeared in mainline almost 2 years ago. Ack. Sorry about that. Wrong ucb thread. ucb1400_core still has build errors in linux-next since it uses ac97_bus_type even when CONFIG_SOUND=n. --- ~Randy Linux Plumbers Conference, 17-19 September 2008, Portland, Oregon USA http://linuxplumbersconf.org/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
