On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 13:42:39 +1000
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 13:14:58 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the v4l-dvb tree got a conflict in
> > drivers/media/radio/dsbr100.c between commit
> > 59d1f04f76c8386d468f74c18fe5c008752c9340 ("USB: remove warn() macro from
> > usb.h") from the usb tree and commit
> > 63057954eb49549963c4c5079381492575cab33a ("V4L/DVB (8778): radio: fix
> > incorrect video_register_device result check") from the v4l-dvb tree.
> >
> > Just a context clash. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix.
>
> Of course, this is fixable in the v4l-dvb tree as well.
Hi Stephen,
Thanks for warning me. Unfortunately, I got some issues on my current procedure
of handling my tree. The old procedure of using stacked git were much better
from my side, but were leading to a few inconsistencies. I'm still trying to
find a way to allow me to merge my patches without generating merge noise on
upstream tree and without needing to rebase every time a patch is merged
upstream.
I'm trying to give a definitive solution to fix it. Due to
that, I had to rebase my tree (in fact, I've re-created it). So, this conflict
will likely rise on today's (and probably on tomorrow's merge), since I'm
currently focused on fixing my tree to send a long list of pending stuff
upstream.
Cheers,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
