Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> [Ingo, thanks for the heads up about this ...]
>
> Hi Ingo,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the sparseirq tree got a conflict in
> arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c between commit
> 168d2f464ab9860f0d1e66cf1f9684973222f1c6 ("xen: save previous spinlock
> when blocking") from the x86 tree and commit
> fb6dc57946f9ebfeac546dd0698d9f065c191668 ("x86: move kstat_irqs from
> kstat to irq_desc") from the sparseirq tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry it.
>
This is a diff-diff? The change:
- kstat_this_cpu.irqs[irq]++;
- /* block until irq becomes pending */
- xen_poll_irq(irq);
+ kstat_irqs_this_cpu(irq_to_desc(irq))++;
looks fine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
