Hi Russell, Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: drivers/input/touchscreen/ucb1400_ts.c: In function 'ucb1400_ts_detect_irq': drivers/input/touchscreen/ucb1400_ts.c:333: error: 'NO_IRQ' undeclared (first use in this function) I applied the following patch. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ >From 3a6383e5556524c941c1421a0e65a0725189ac9e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:49:30 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] ucb1400: restore NO_IRQ definition This piece of code was removed by commit 2881353061f896c3894c64e39cf2be35b36aa9fc ("[ARM] 5184/1: Split ucb1400_ts into core and touchscreen"). Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/input/touchscreen/ucb1400_ts.c | 4 ++++ 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/ucb1400_ts.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/ucb1400_ts.c index 006499b..5498662 100644 --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/ucb1400_ts.c +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/ucb1400_ts.c @@ -289,6 +289,10 @@ static void ucb1400_ts_close(struct input_dev *idev) ucb1400_reg_write(ucb->ac97, UCB_TS_CR, 0); } +#ifndef NO_IRQ +#define NO_IRQ 0 +#endif + /* * Try to probe our interrupt, rather than relying on lots of * hard-coded machine dependencies. -- 1.5.6.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
