Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Hiroshi, > > On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:11:17 -0700 Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I got an error on um defconfig; >> >> arch/um/drivers/line.c: In function 'line_ioctl': >> arch/um/drivers/line.c:306: error: implicit declaration of function 'tioclinux' >> make[1]: *** [arch/um/drivers/line.o] Error 1 >> >> >> This commit may cause it. >> >> commit 1aa5f1fab397054a9133bcaf511973db5a6b97be >> Author: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Mon Aug 11 10:27:35 2008 +1000 >> >> tty-fixup-uml >> >> Add a new nicer hook for tioclinux > > It looks like it may be fixed in today's linux-next as that patch has > been updated. > Hi, thanks for working. I got a linkage error, next; arch/um/drivers/built-in.o: In function `line_ioctl': /data/kernel/mainline/workdir/next/.branches/um/linux/arch/um/drivers/line.c:306: undefined reference to `tioclinux' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status KSYM .tmp_kallsyms1.S nm: '.tmp_vmlinux1': No such file No valid symbol. make: *** [.tmp_kallsyms1.S] Error 1 The tioclinux() is in drivers/char/vt.c and this is compiled when CONFIG_HW_CONSOLE is enabled. I think this config is never turned on in uml, because of the following definition in drivers/char/Kconfig; config HW_CONSOLE bool depends on VT && !S390 && !UML default y thanks, Hiroshi Shimamoto -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
