On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 06:21:09PM +0900, ext Paul Mundt wrote: > Yes, that fixes that problem at least, thanks. Cool :-) > Now the I/O bits are the only outstanding issue, as I still need the > CONFIG_SUPERH test in musb_io.h to get around conflicting definitions. I think we're gonna need that for a while, can you send a proper patch changing that ifndef ?? Feel free to put my Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@xxxxxxxxx> if you wish. > Presently ARM and SH are the only ones that define the readsl() variants > anyways, so stubbing in an extra ifdef there is fine as a temporary > measure, but it's not a long-term solution. The only reason SH defines > them at all is because we ran in to this exact same problem the last time > an ARM driver tried passing itself off as generic ;-) eheh... But this actually is a generic driver, we're only missing a pci bus glue to use the musb chip on the opt cards, that would be really nice :-) -- balbi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
