On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 09:20:07 +0200 (CEST) Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 6 Aug 2008, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > One randconfig ends with: > > > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `wd_probe1': > > wd.c:(.init.text+0x6179): undefined reference to `NS8390p_init' > > make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 > > drivers/net/Makefile has: > > obj-$(CONFIG_WD80x3) += wd.o 8390.o > > So either wd_probe1() should call NS8390_init(), or obj-$(CONFIG_WD80x3) > should link with 8390p.o. Don't know which is the appropriate change > here (my gut feeling says the latter). Safest is the latter. The shared memory interface on the wd is full speed 8 or 16bit (depending on card/jumpers) but I'm not clear about the NIC. Most of the performance hit is on the packet transfer which is private methods on this device so using 8390p won't make a big difference on this board anyway. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html