Re: linux-next: manual merge of the m68k tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



	Hi Stephen,

On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the m68k tree got a conflict in init/main.c

Sorry, still haven't updated my queue after OLS...

> between commit bd673c7c3b1681dbfabab0062e67398dadf806af ("initrd: cast
> `initrd_start' to `void *'") from Linus' tree and commit
> d9c4ef589d1eda15333fb3d307bf4df85337820a ("initrd: Fix virtual/physical
> mix-up in overwrite test") from the m68k tree (which is also in Linus'
> tree).

Interesting, so git didn't notice that my version got merged, and an
additional patch was applied on top?

> I took the version from Linus' tree.

Yep, that's the correct one. Thx!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

						Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux