On Wednesday 30 July 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:06:50 +0200 Bernhard Walle <bwalle@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > * Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> [2008-07-29 21:48]: > > > > Isn't this the opposite end of the same problem for which Bernhard > > > > has been repeatedly trying to find a taker for his patch: > > > > > > > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.kexec/1882 > > > > > > Yes. It's not the kobject patch at fault here, it's the use of kobjects > > > so early in the boot process. That needs to be fixed. > > It was a bit optimistic to stick an unconditional GFP_KERNEL allocation > into the previously-atomic kobject_init(). > > It's only 128 bytes, so why can't we fix both problems thusly? Fixes the bug for me (also true for previous patch from Bernhard). Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
