Re: [PATCH v3 2/2 RESEND] checkpatch: warn on empty rust doc comments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 8:11 AM Patrick Miller <paddymills@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> After the latest revision of my patch [1], I split the if statement so that
> there is a parent check for rust files for future rust patch checks. So,
> this would perfectly fit within that block.
>
> Do you want me to add your code and credit you in my patch?
>
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20240914181618.837227-2-paddymills@xxxxxxxxx/

Please disregard my prior email, I had failed to CC everyone. Since
the change is small I'm okay with adding it as part of your patch,
please do add the Co-developed-by tag, thanks!

However, I was curious how conflicts like these are generally
resolved. For example, if there are two large patchsets which conflict
with each other, how does one ensure that they are compatible, and
even if they are, how do the maintainers ensure that they are applied
in the correct order?





[Index of Archives]     [Audio]     [Hams]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux