Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Add getter/setter static inlines for x86 descriptors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Joe Damato wrote:
> Static inline getters/setters have been provided to encourage consumers not to touch the internals of 32bit x86 descriptors directly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joe Damato <ice799@xxxxxxxxx>

Okay, what is the motivation for this?

This is a serious question.  The x86 descriptors are so complex that
it's not clear to me that this restriction makes the code any more
clear.  Especially not with things like:

-		cpu->arch.gdt[i].b |= 0x00000100;
+		desc_set_hi(tmp,  desc_get_hi(tmp) | 0x00000100);

This isn't an improvement.  If you're doing to so something like this,
you need to actually implement the *intent* here.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs

[Index of Archives]     [Audio]     [Hams]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux