Re: Should ICMP echo responses be 'bound to the interface' of the incoming ICMP echo request?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 03:02:53 +0200 (CEST)

> On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, andrei radulescu-banu wrote:
> 
>> But here's a problem: the kernel supports only up to 256 route
>> domains, and I'd like to be able to use more interfaces than that,
>> physical plus virtual.
> 
> Sounds like that 256 limit should be the thing to be looked into then.

That limit was removed ages ago.

I notice that when discussions occur on this list, a lot of misinformation
gets spread around.

The problem is that the actual networking developers don't read this list,
they read netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx instead.

Maybe it's time that we just get rid of linux-net because it's been nothing
but problematic as users search for information on it and very few people
on that list are knowledgable enough to even consider answering.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux