Re: How to debug system hangs (bug #15737) on start of composite WM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 19:58 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, September 15, 2010 10:51 am, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
> > I have problems debugging system hangs (bug #15737 -
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15737) which occur on
> > kernels >=2.6.33 (LTS i.e. 2.6.32 is not affected).
> >
> > I cannot manage to debug them especially it actual results evolve along
> > with changes in userspace (however 2.6.32 is not affected). On various
> > stages:
> >
> >
> > - Second start of composite WM would be either hard hang or will fix
> > the system (i.e. problem will not be reproduced until next reboot - and
> > will not be reproduced after hibernation) - recently (for 2 weeks) false -
> > First start of X will result in soft hang only - true except some
> > builds of 2.6.35 with relocatable kernel (???) and very old builds (2.6.33)
> >  - Magic SysRQ key does not work on hard hang
> > - If second start of WM was successful the DRI after some time will
> > report bad drawables. It is fixed by reboot - recent (for 2 weeks) -
> > Switching to console and back helps (i.e. more often there is no
> > hang) - possibly voodoo magic but it may help - Error messages about
> > failing to pinpoint buffor (cause? side-effect?) - Running X in gdb hangs
> > system (even if it is not on current VT)
> >
> > Soft hang: X hangs but I can switch to console. Turning off X will stop
> > it but it takes some time (a minute?). There is nothing in logs (X, dmesg,
> > system...) Hard hang: System is not responsive including network, X, sysrq
> > etc. This is not kernel panic (caps lock and num lock does not blink).
> >
> >
> > Someone (probably not kernel dev) suggested that it might be connected
> > with removing BKL.
> >
> > I am really sorry for spamming but I run out of ideas how to debug this
> > problem.
> >
> > Regards
> 
> 
> Hi,
> You should ask this on some other mailing list,
> like linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 

Sorry. I have no idea how does this e-mail ended on linux-net mailing
list.

My e-mail client is surly conspiring against me ;)

Sorry for mistake.

Regards

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux