Is there a reason that /usr/include/netinet/ip.h only contains definitions for ToS (precedence-based) markings? RFCs 2597/2598 have been out a *long* time... why is Linux so far behind the learning curve? We're discussing (at least here in the US) net neutrality... but if we're not marking our traffic the way we want it carried *anyway*, don't we deserve what we get if the carriers reshape our traffic by their own rules? Should there be definitions in netinet/ip.h like: #define IPTOS_DSCP_MASK 0xd0 #define IPTOS_DSCP(x) ((x) & IPTOS_DSCP_MASK) #define IPTOS_DSCP_AF11 0x28 #define IPTOS_DSCP_AF12 0x30 #define IPTOS_DSCP_AF13 0x38 #define IPTOS_DSCP_AF21 0x48 #define IPTOS_DSCP_AF22 0x50 #define IPTOS_DSCP_AF23 0x58 #define IPTOS_DSCP_AF31 0x68 #define IPTOS_DSCP_AF32 0x70 #define IPTOS_DSCP_AF33 0x78 #define IPTOS_DSCP_AF41 0x88 #define IPTOS_DSCP_AF42 0x90 #define IPTOS_DSCP_AF43 0x98 #define IPTOS_DSCP_EF 0xb8 Should be simple enough, right? Thanks, -Philip -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
