Re: time for TCP ECN defaulting to on?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:

And about somebody earlier claiming that they'll get an impressions that Linux stack is broken (if such people even know that there's some network stack in Linux :-))... I'm rather sure those isp supports etc. put a blaim on us anyway even when loads of counterproof would exists because it's just cheaper to do nothing and blaim linux instead. Also some claims asserted by incompetent people easily start to live among random forums; an example from the previous incident: "since disabling timestamps helps, it must be that timestamps are broken" (and somebody even "more clueful" added that they got enabled for 2.6.27?!?), needless to say, neither holds.

Not all of the routers in question (the ones that crash, block packets or otherwise misbehave) are provided by ISPs - in fact a huge number of them are and have been sold retail. Over time most of those boxes will get replaced with ones that don't have the problem because most (probably all major) SOHO router suppliers now test that they don't break with ECN so eventually there will be a point where enabling ECN by default will make a lot of sense (there will be too few broken routers to care about).

What I do believe (having spent a lot of years writing embedded device and router code - and no, not the ones that crash ;-)) is that if you enable a feature that causes just 1% of users to have an out-of-the-box problem you'll see a seriously disproportionate response from end users. Most people (and engineers are not "most people" :-)) will blame the new thing that they've just added or changed, not the old thing that was broken to begin with (it's human nature not to truly understand cause and effect).

Whether we like it or not there's currently a known problem deploying ECN on a wide scale - it has been sufficient to stop pretty-much everyone from enabling it by default so far.


Regards,
Dave


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux