Re: e1000 softirq load balancing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks David.

Would you mind giving me a bit of intuition why I can't have a 1:1 mapping of CPUs to NICs?
I am a bit out of my depth here, but I'd like to learn.

Best,
Don

David Miller wrote:
From: Don Porter <porterde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:05:34 -0500

It seems to me that with 4 independent NICs and plenty of CPUs to
spare, I ought to be able to assign one softirq daemon to each NIC
rather than funnelling all of the traffic through 1 or 2.

Traffic doesn't get distributed unless the NIC has support
for RX flow seperation and PCI MSI-X interrupts.  Your NICs
do not.

So no matter how hard you try, each NIC is going to have it's
packets processed essentially on one cpu.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux