Re: e1000: rx_no_buffer_count

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Forget to mention:

Fedora based system. Kernel: 2.6.24
e1000 driver:  7.6.15.4-NAPI

Thanks,
Khoa

On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Khoa Nguyen <khoa.coffee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I am running load test across a system with a Intel Gige interface. I
>  notice there are lots of rx_no_buffer_count errors:
>
>      rx_length_errors: 0
>      rx_over_errors: 0
>      rx_crc_errors: 0
>      rx_frame_errors: 0
>      rx_no_buffer_count: 14200594
>      rx_missed_errors: 29
>      tx_aborted_errors: 0
>      tx_carrier_errors: 0
>      tx_fifo_errors: 0
>      tx_heartbeat_errors: 0
>      tx_window_errors: 0
>
>  but the CPUs utilization is only about 2%. What are the conditions
>  that may cause this rx_no_buffer_count condition?
>
>  Thanks,
>  Khoa
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux