Re: conntrack doesn't always work when a bridge is used

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Damien Thébault wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007 8:03 PM, Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Could you capture the conntrack events of the non-working
case with (run in parallel):

conntrack -E
conntrack -E expect


Sure, here it is :

That actually looks like it works properly.

New control connection:

    [NEW] tcp      6 120 SYN_SENT src=192.168.1.5 dst=192.168.2.250
sport=45090 dport=21 [UNREPLIED] src=192.168.2.50 dst=192.168.2.70
sport=21 dport=45090
 [UPDATE] tcp      6 60 SYN_RECV src=192.168.1.5 dst=192.168.2.250
sport=45090 dport=21 src=192.168.2.50 dst=192.168.2.70 sport=21
dport=45090
 [UPDATE] tcp      6 432000 ESTABLISHED src=192.168.1.5
dst=192.168.2.250 sport=45090 dport=21 src=192.168.2.50
dst=192.168.2.70 sport=21 dport=45090 [ASSURED]

New expectation for data connection:

> conntrack -E expect :
>
> 300 proto=6 src=192.168.2.50 dst=192.168.2.70 sport=0 dport=33344

New data connection machting expectation, both source and
destination properly NATed:

    [NEW] tcp      6 120 SYN_SENT src=192.168.2.50 dst=192.168.2.70
sport=20 dport=33344 [UNREPLIED] src=192.168.1.5 dst=192.168.2.250
sport=33344 dport=20
 [UPDATE] tcp      6 60 SYN_RECV src=192.168.2.50 dst=192.168.2.70
sport=20 dport=33344 src=192.168.1.5 dst=192.168.2.250 sport=33344
dport=20
 [UPDATE] tcp      6 432000 ESTABLISHED src=192.168.2.50
dst=192.168.2.70 sport=20 dport=33344 src=192.168.1.5
dst=192.168.2.250 sport=33344 dport=20 [ASSURED]
 [UPDATE] tcp      6 120 FIN_WAIT src=192.168.2.50 dst=192.168.2.70
sport=20 dport=33344 src=192.168.1.5 dst=192.168.2.250 sport=33344
dport=20 [ASSURED]
 [UPDATE] tcp      6 60 CLOSE_WAIT src=192.168.2.50 dst=192.168.2.70
sport=20 dport=33344 src=192.168.1.5 dst=192.168.2.250 sport=33344
dport=20 [ASSURED]
 [UPDATE] tcp      6 10 CLOSE src=192.168.2.50 dst=192.168.2.70
sport=20 dport=33344 src=192.168.1.5 dst=192.168.2.250 sport=33344
dport=20 [ASSURED]

Data connection closed

 [UPDATE] tcp      6 120 FIN_WAIT src=192.168.1.5 dst=192.168.2.250
sport=45090 dport=21 src=192.168.2.50 dst=192.168.2.70 sport=21
dport=45090 [ASSURED]
 [UPDATE] tcp      6 60 CLOSE_WAIT src=192.168.1.5 dst=192.168.2.250
sport=45090 dport=21 src=192.168.2.50 dst=192.168.2.70 sport=21
dport=45090 [ASSURED]
 [UPDATE] tcp      6 30 LAST_ACK src=192.168.1.5 dst=192.168.2.250
sport=45090 dport=21 src=192.168.2.50 dst=192.168.2.70 sport=21
dport=45090 [ASSURED]
 [UPDATE] tcp      6 120 TIME_WAIT src=192.168.1.5 dst=192.168.2.250
sport=45090 dport=21 src=192.168.2.50 dst=192.168.2.70 sport=21
dport=45090 [ASSURED]
 [UPDATE] tcp      6 10 CLOSE src=192.168.1.5 dst=192.168.2.250
sport=45090 dport=21 src=192.168.2.50 dst=192.168.2.70 sport=21
dport=45090 [ASSURED]

Control connection closed

[DESTROY] tcp      6 src=192.168.2.50 dst=192.168.2.70 sport=20
dport=33344 packets=4 bytes=559 src=192.168.1.5 dst=192.168.2.250
sport=33344 dport=20 packets=4 bytes=216

[DESTROY] tcp      6 src=192.168.1.5 dst=192.168.2.250 sport=45090
dport=21 packets=17 bytes=916 src=192.168.2.50 dst=192.168.2.70
sport=21 dport=45090 packets=12 bytes=1162

Both connections destroyed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux