Re: Network sharing without using NAT, possible?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ok, going back to the beginning... if you only have one public IP, you
will use nat.  w2k3 RRAS is probably configured with rules to handle the
extra issues with the VoIP protocols... you never said which one, SIP,
IAX2, H.323, MGCP...

Linux comes blank, no iptables rules, you have to add extra iptables
rules to deal with VoIP.  It's probably easier than your bridge setup.
even a $50 d-link router can do this easily.

If you are using SIP ip_nat_sip kernel module can help add the abillity.

This is more of a VoIP problem than a linux-net problem, try this:


http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Linux+Router

and for the actual port forwarding:

http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/port+forwarding

You should also consider using a STUN server outside your network for
your voip devices to figure out the type of NAT.


On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 16:40 +0000, Mateus Interciso wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:28:00 -0600, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 16:11 +0000, Mateus Interciso wrote:
> >> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:04:40 +0000, Mateus Interciso wrote:
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> >> Maybe, if I explain a little more about the fisical network we have, it
> >> may be easier to understand(or find the problem)
> > 

-- 
Jeremy Jackson
Coplanar Networks
(519)489-4903

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux