Re: Network sharing without using NAT, possible?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:34:11 -0500, Christopher Fowler wrote:

> On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 22:22 -0200, Zarnick Maelstorm wrote:
>> The problem is that I'm bound to this damn Sipura 2k, and man, is this
>> giving me a headache...any tips?
> 
> If I can remember I believe the problem is that the Sipura does not know
> the gateway address.  If you can tell it that in config I believe it may
> work.
> 
> Here is some info
> 
> http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2005-May/101444.html
> 
> I would do a google search on Sipura 2000 and Double NAT to see what
> info it out there.
> 
> You can read discussions I have in this archive
> 
> http://lists.atlaug.com/pipermail/aaug/2007-February/thread.html
> 
> Read subjects named "Delayed Ring"
> 
> Chris
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info
> at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

The problem is, that is not on a double NAT, here's how the network works:
---------------
| INTERNET    |
---------------
	||
	||
	\/
-----------------
|Linux Fwl w/NAT|
-----------------
	||
/=================================\
   ||     ||      || || || || || ||
(Comp a) (Phone)  (Other Computers)
See? It's just one simple NAT.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux