> If the underlying device can do scatter-gather and checksumming,
> the TCP code builds outgoing packets by copying user date into
> full system pages, and then attaching those pages into the SKB.
> The protocol headers sit under the skb->data linear area, and
> the user data mostly sits in the user pages under
> skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[]
>
> This increases the density of data packed into the memory allocated
> compared to using skb->data for it. It also enormously simplifies
> the logic necessary to support TSO.
Thank you very much, I think I am starting to get it now and coming to
think of it this will make my patch much more elegant. I have spent the
day reading more code, and am wondering if something along the likes of
this piece of code will do what I want ("copy" the data from the next skb
in the retransmission queue into this skb):
//Do preliminary checks to see if the "new" packet will be within mss,
that this_skb->nr_frags + next_skb->nr_frags < MAX_SKB_FRAGS and so on
int i;
int this_frags = this_skb->nr_frags;
for(i=0; i<next_skb->nr_frags; i++)
//Does the "copy"
this_skb->frags[this_frags + i] = next_skb->frags[i];
this_skb->data_len += next_skb->data_len;
this_skb->truesize += next_skb->data_len;
this_skb->nr_frags += next_skb->nr_frags;
//Update TSO?
By the way, am I correct in my assumption that one SKB's frags is stored
linearly in the frags-array? Or have I made a horrible misunderstanding?
:)
One of the things that I have yet to understand is the frag_list in the
skb_shared_info-struct. Does this contain all skb's that "use" this frag
and works as a sort of referance counter (frag won't be removed until the
variable is NULL and I have to append this_skb to the list), or is it
something else?
Thanks again for all help.
-Kristian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
