On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 10:48:41AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@xxxxx> wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 10:15:53AM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Vignaud wrote: > > ... > > > I was still testing on -rc2: > > > Subject: [patch] genirq: temporary fix for level-triggered IRQ resend > > > Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:00:37 +0200 > > > > > > For me after 1day 20hours, the network is still up, with more than > > > 1To of network traffic. HZ was 1000, i restart with HZ=100. > > > > For me it's enough too but Thomas seems to doubt. > > seem to doubt what? That rc2 fixes the symptom? That is a sure thing, > and we never doubted that. I think you might have misunderstood what > Thomas said and meant, so please just state your opinion unambiguously > so that we can fix any mis-communication :) > > Ingo > On 25-07-2007 02:19, Thomas Gleixner wrote: ... > Actually we only need the resend for edge type interrupts. Level type > interrupts come back once enable_irq() re-enables the interrupt line. > On 10-08-2007 10:05, Thomas Gleixner wrote: ... > But suppressing the resend is not fixing the driver problem. The problem > can show up with spurious interrupts and with interrupts on a shared PCI > interrupt line at any time. It just might take weeks instead of minutes. Maybe I miss something but it's not the same! So, should Jean-Baptiste or Marcin test this for weeks or it's enough? Jarek P. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
