Re: /proc/net/vlan/config output patch and question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



nkiesel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx said:
> when creating a VLAN device, I end up with names like
> "vlan8_rename@eth0" when using VLAN_NAME_TYPE_PLUS_VID_NO_PAD.  Other
> formats have that "_rename" appended as well. Any idea where that comes
> from? I'm running a stock 2.6.20.4 kernel on Debian unstable using
> vconfig from vlan-1.9-2.  I checked the vconfig sources but these don't
> contain the _rename AFAICS.

The "_rename" suffix on interface names is an indication of udev rules
trying to give two different interfaces the same name. This is a common
problem with vlans, since they share most attributes with their master
interface. It's why udev configurations (including debian's) include a
DRIVERS=="?*" match on generated rules - that will match a physical
interface, but not vlan interfaces bound to it. You probably have a rule
that's missing this.

Jason

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux