On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 05:07:10PM +0100, John (linux.kernel@xxxxxxx) wrote: > Again, this is irrelevant. We are discussing whether it would make sense > to support sub-microsecond resolution. If there is one platform that can > achieve sub-microsecond precision, there is a need for sub-microsecond > resolution. As long as we are changing the resolution, we might as well > use something standard like struct timespec. You can not blindly change skb timestamps to different entities - you need to change all users (at least in kernel). Exporting it to userspace must require new socket option and old one ust be changed accordingly, but there is nothing wrong in having nanosecond resolution in packet timestamp except that it might not be 100% correct receiving time. -- Evgeniy Polyakov - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
