On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 16:26 -0600, Kent Yoder wrote: > Hi, > > I was browsing through the xfrm_user.c code and noticed that it > appears that in xfrm_add_sa_expire, the only possible return codes are > -ENOENT and -EINVAL. Was this intentional, or is this a bug? > > Thanks, > Kent It does look quite odd I agree. Looks like it forgot to set err = 0 after the last goto. Anyway you will probably find a better answer and reach the right people with this question on netdev rather than linux-net. -Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
