> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-net-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:linux-net-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bernd Eckenfels > Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 6:13 PM > To: linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: ESTABLISHED TCP connections missing from /proc/net/tcp > > In article > <46F9780F64AE9945815725F4C0C72CB80183CC77@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > de.com> you wrote: > > Any ideas as to why I am not seeing established TCP connections in > > /proc/net/tcp? > > Could be a rootkit. Not sure if there is any kernel bug. Could you please elaborate a bit on what "rootkit" means in this context? > Is that a new problem? Has it worked before? New Kernel? We've been trying for the last several months to wean ourselves off the ancient 2.4.19 kernel we have used in our fibre channel switch products for many years (yes, a long overdue effort). This is one of many things that worked with the old kernel but which now does not seem to work with 2.6.14. Whether it ever worked since we began this porting to 2.6 effort is at this point an open question. We do make mods to open source kernel space code like ethernet and flash drivers, but mucking with the core networking stuff where this is implemented is something we like to avoid, so its hard for me to see how we could have broke it here at Brocade (but one never knows). I tried searching for this at bugzilla.kernel.org and got no hits, but then maybe the search criteria I used wasn't right. Is nobody else seeing this? Thanks, Jeff Haran Brocade Communications Systems > > > Gruss > Bernd > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > linux-net" in the body of a message to > majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at > http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
