On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 12:08:01PM -0600, greg@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Environment: > 2.4.33.3 host kernel with SKAS3 patch. > Stock 2.6.18 UML guest kernel. > > Host kernel has IPV6 enabled but there are no IPV6 routers > active on the subnet. The active eth0 host interface only has > a link-local address assigned to it. > > The host kernel was recompiled with the only change being to drop IPV6 > from the kernel. Identical guest OS implementation boots and properly > pings the same target host on the network. So, you're saying that IPV6, even though it is not being used, is somehow interfering with normal IPV4 networking? > I know 2.4.33.3 is a bit dated so this might be better to bounce off > Willy. > > Thoughts, further suggestions? Maybe upgrade and hope the problem goes away. It sounds like this should be reproducable without UML, so if you can reproduce this on a newer kernel with a smaller test case, that might help get it fixed. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
