Lehner Franz wrote: > > take a linux, configure this kind > > eth0: 192.168.10.200 / 255.255.255.0 > eth1: 192.168.10.201 / 255.255.255.0 > > Both Interfaces are "real ethernet cards" and are connected to same > switch > > if you take now a 3'rd machine, and do a > > arping -c 1 192.168.10.200 > > 60 bytes from 00:0c:29:bc:96:fe ( 192.168.10.200): index=0 time=645.876 > 60 bytes from 00:0c:29:bc:96:f4 ( 192.168.10.200): index=1 time=1.472 > > arping -c 1 192.168.10.201 > > 60 bytes from 00:0c:29:bc:96:fe (192.168.10.201 ): index=0 time=833.988 > 60 bytes from 00:0c:29:bc:96:f4 (192.168.10.201): index=1 time=1.211 > > in fact, this is "****" as arp table of switches and other machines > are not knowing what to do By aging the entry, arp tables should be ok. But I agree that the default is non-intuitive, and cause for un-intended insecure connections. Thanks! -- Al - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
