On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Christoph Lameter <christoph@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:04:52 -0700 (PDT) > > > The patch also removes the atomic_dec_and_test in dst_destroy. > > That is the only part of this patch I'm willing to entertain > at this time, as long as Herbert Xu ACKs it. How much of that > quoted %3 gain does this change alone give you? Nothing as far as I can tell. The main benefit may be reorganization of the code. > Also, please post networking patches to netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Because you didn't, the majority of the networking maintainers > did not see your dst patch submissions. It's mentioned in > linux/MAINTAINERS for a reason: > > NETWORKING [GENERAL] > P: Networking Team > M: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > L: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > S: Maintained > > Thanks. Yes and it was recently changed. Typical use is linux-xxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
