Re: Question about QOS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thomas Graf wrote:
* Nicolas DICHTEL <426F42F0.9020609@xxxxxxxxx> 2005-04-27 09:44

Yes I agree, it doesn't really matter what value we return and `bound'
is most likely to be correct. I think we should also fix the unlikely
but still possible case when tv1.tv_usec is slightly smaller than
tv2.tv_usec. I know it is very unlikely but do_gettimeofday really
is not that reliable and we have users which rely on a positive
delta. Can you extend your patch to return abs(delta) for case 0
in PSCHED_TDIFF_SAFE?

Why abs(delta)? It could be above bound, in fact all cases besides delta_sec > 2 doesn't take care to stay inside [0..bound] at all.

[PKT_SCHED]: Fix range in PSCHED_TDIFF_SAFE to 0..bound

Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>

---
commit d5f65671be760f33c1c7667f793ed75ad6e6a710
tree 4af3018396f125b0c2601882d924e63a0d74bef4
parent 980207c270e72e2cc6ae7b0de6ea6cd38a726e5b
author Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> 1114776755 +0200
committer Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> 1114776755 +0200

Index: include/net/pkt_sched.h
===================================================================
--- e38e7620d369bfa898a2e3f6aaf2f04c8826f38e/include/net/pkt_sched.h  (mode:100644 sha1:7352e455053cc857e70f0cb1e008eb7adabbe011)
+++ 4af3018396f125b0c2601882d924e63a0d74bef4/include/net/pkt_sched.h  (mode:100644 sha1:fcb05a387dbee560d6a0f20b6e8c3c4f1b2d93f1)
@@ -157,7 +157,8 @@
 	   case 1: \
 		   __delta += 1000000; \
 	   case 0: \
-		   __delta = abs(__delta); \
+ 		   if (__delta > bound || __delta < 0) \
+ 			__delta = bound; \
 	   } \
 	   __delta; \
 })

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux