Em Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 12:22:22AM +0200, Jesper Juhl escreveu: > kfree(0) is perfectly valid, checking pointers for NULL before calling > kfree() on them is redundant. The patch below cleans away a few such > redundant checks (and while I was around some of those bits I couldn't > stop myself from making a few tiny whitespace changes as well). Acked-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de MElo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html