Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] drivers/net/ns83820.c: remove unused code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



applied

On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 10:57:17PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The Coveity checker found that residue is always 0.
> 
> Is this patch correct or should residue have been used?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> --- linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm1-full/drivers/net/ns83820.c.old	2005-03-22 21:32:15.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm1-full/drivers/net/ns83820.c	2005-03-22 21:33:16.000000000 +0100
> @@ -1189,7 +1189,6 @@
>  
>  	for (;;) {
>  		volatile u32 *desc = dev->tx_descs + (free_idx * DESC_SIZE);
> -		u32 residue = 0;
>  
>  		dprintk("frag[%3u]: %4u @ 0x%08Lx\n", free_idx, len,
>  			(unsigned long long)buf);
> @@ -1199,17 +1198,11 @@
>  		desc_addr_set(desc + DESC_BUFPTR, buf);
>  		desc[DESC_EXTSTS] = cpu_to_le32(extsts);
>  
> -		cmdsts = ((nr_frags|residue) ? CMDSTS_MORE : do_intr ? CMDSTS_INTR : 0);
> +		cmdsts = ((nr_frags) ? CMDSTS_MORE : do_intr ? CMDSTS_INTR : 0);
>  		cmdsts |= (desc == first_desc) ? 0 : CMDSTS_OWN;
>  		cmdsts |= len;
>  		desc[DESC_CMDSTS] = cpu_to_le32(cmdsts);
>  
> -		if (residue) {
> -			buf += len;
> -			len = residue;
> -			continue;
> -		}
> -
>  		if (!nr_frags)
>  			break;
>  
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-ns83820' in
> the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx

-- 
"Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once." -- John Wheeler
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux