Re: [PATCH bridge-2.6.11] bridge hub_enabled option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 01:42:15AM +0200, Henrik Nordstrom after a spiritual call wrote  :
~> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Craig Robson wrote:
~> 
~> >When I needed this feature it wasn't security related.
~> 
~> So why did you need it?

The patch introduces just an option, doesn't changes the scope of the universe.

Currently I'm using it to test a routing protocol.

~> But again, the exact same can be done with netfilter/ebtables (not 
~> iptables like I mistakenly said in an earlier message) by denying 
~> forwarding between the interfaces within the bridge.

It's the same of saying: <<Why do you use the bridge, you can handle it with
iptables/netfilter>>.
For me it's just a simpler low level option, then you can use it to do whatever
you like.

Regards
-- 
:wq!
"I don't know nothing" The One Who reached the Thinking Matter   '.'

[ Alpt --- Freaknet Medialab ]
[ GPG Key ID 441CF0EE ]
[ Key fingerprint = 8B02 26E8 831A 7BB9 81A9  5277 BFF8 037E 441C F0EE ]
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux