Re: Why "tp->write_seq = 1"?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 01:44:43 +0100
Xuân Baldauf <xuan--2005.03.12--linux-net--vger.kernel.org@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> skewing write_seq==0 to write_seq==1 might be harmless, but I'm still 
> wondering, why this kind of skewing is done at all. Maybe you have a 
> hint? :-)

Perhaps some old systems get confused by an initial sequence number of
zero, but I can't say for sure.

> P.S.: I'm also wondering wether it is possible to call ioctl SIOCOUTQ 
> after linux notified the application that a TCP connection broke 
> (because the other side went offline unexpectedly).

A broken connection by definition has no output queue.  But Linux will
give you whatever the final tp->write_seq - tp->snd_una value was
a the time of the connection breakage in this case.
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux