Re: [PATCH] TCP-Hybla proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:14:47 -0800, David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:03:11 -0500 (EST)
John Heffner <jheffner@xxxxxxx> wrote:


> An idea I've been toying with for a while now is completely abstracting
> congestion control.  Then you could have congestion control loadable
> modules, which would avoid this mess of experimental algorithms inside the
> main-line kernel.  If done right, they might be able to work seamlessly
> with SCTP, too.  The tricky part is making sure the interface is complete
> enough.
There might be a noticeable performance impact to making it truly modular. Calling a function in a module is slower. In some tests, I see a 5 to 10% drop in performance when Ethernet driver is a module versus builtin.

You might want to look at how the I/O schedulers are configured as an example.


The symbols exported to allow this would need to be EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL().


Why's that?

Because the kernel developers who hold the collective copyright on the existing GPL TCP code do not want some vendor producing a closed source binary module of "enhanced TCP".
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux