Re: tg3 bridge problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gergely Madarasz wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 02:41:34PM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:

Gergely Madarasz wrote:

On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 12:40:57PM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:


Gergely Madarasz wrote:


On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 11:04:55AM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:



Strange. My concern was that the tg3 interface has its hardware reset whenever its set to be up, and part of that is a resetting of its receive mode. If for some reason IFF_PROMISC was cleared after you set it using brctl, the interface might be taken out of promisc mode. Do you have any iptables rules running that might drop bpdus?


No iptables rules az all. Btw iptables wouldn't prevent tcpdump from
seeing the packets, would it?
Could it be that the driver perhaps has a problem setting promisc mode
when resetting the hardware?


Not really sure about this. One experiment is worth a thousand guesses I suppose....... I'll try and let you know. :)


I did some other checks, like adding an explicit ifconfig eth0 promisc,
then looking at tcpdump output - I didn't see any stray packets like I
usually do, just ethernet broadcasts and unicasts to my mac, this also
points to a problem that the ethernet interface is actually not in
promisc, while the driver thinks it is.

And it is probably not a driver-only issue. I've got older machines with
tg3 running fine with bridge (with an older tg3 driver), and eth1 on the
same machine also runs fine. On another machine I tested today, an IBM
x326, the same thing happens - eth0 broken, eth1 fine. Would access to one
of these machines help? :)

Greg

I've got a tg3 card here. I'll try re-create it as soon as I have time.


Sounds great, but I expect it will not occur with a random tg3 card,
explained above...


Mmmmm....post your lspci -vvv entry for your broken tg3 card?


Just out of curiosity, are you running tcpdump against the physical interface or the bridged interface? I do recall some issues involving using PF_PACKET on virtual interfaces, that might cause you to not see some packets that the physical interface really does receive.


The physical interface of course. I wouldn't have a chance seeing the
bpdu's on the bridge interface because they're handled by the bridge
driver and not passed on :)

Greg
Just making sure.....When you're car doesn't start, make sure you have gas in it before you replace the engine.... :)
Neil


--
/***************************************************
 *Neil Horman
 *Software Engineer
 *Red Hat, Inc.
 *nhorman@xxxxxxxxxx
 *gpg keyid: 1024D / 0x92A74FA1
 *http://pgp.mit.edu
 ***************************************************/
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux