Hello. I've asked a question on linux kernel mailing list about status of route nat, and Sergey Vlasov pointed me to this discussion: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=109582576330019&w=2 So I know that in 2.6 kernel, route nat is broken and no one is going to support, in particular due to few coplaints about this (Next message in that thread: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=109587670428708). I would like to note that many of companies still use 2.4 kernel, where route nat is working. Moving to 2.6 kernel branch is rather long in time (for example I was forced to move only due to SATA controller in my server.). That is the reason for few complaints (particulary zero). Just wanted to note that, this feature is really want to. It is fast, understoodable way to do NAT. Without bycicle on behalf of virtual interfaces on iptables... Thank you for your attention, and thank you for really great work on linux networking!!! -- ______________________________________ Volkov Peter, <pvolkov@xxxxxxxxxxx> Moscow State University, Phys. Dep. ______________________________________ NO ePATENTS, eSIGN now on: http://petition.eurolinux.org and maybe this helps... Linux 2.4.26-gentoo-r9 i686 Mobile Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 1.60GHz P.S. Sorry. I have few time to implement it by myself. So I have to post such entreaties on the list. - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
