Re: [PATCH] MASQUERADE handling of device events

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[added explicit Cc to Dave]

On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 10:18:25AM -0800, Phil Oester wrote:
> The below patch addresses these issues by changing from using ifindex
> comparisons to verifying that the masquerading ip still exists on the
> box.
> 
> To achieve this, two changes were required to core networking code (thus
> the linux-net cc):

Thanks, Phil.  

I think this solution is about the best we can get.

Any other comments?

Dave: would the two changes below be acceptable for you?

> 1) export inet_confirm_addr
> 
> 2) change inet_ifa_match to use ifa_local instead of ifa_address.
>    Since ifa_local != ifa_address on ppp interfaces, inet_ifa_match
>    could not be used to verify ppp interface addresses without
>    this change.
-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>             http://www.netfilter.org/
============================================================================
  "Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
   architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
   on while IP was being designed."                    -- Paul Vixie

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux