Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote: > > 09:39:25.563302 80.x.x.177.41280 > 62.x.x.217.http: . ack 5841 win 0 > > 09:39:25.776159 62.x.x.217.http > 80.x.x.177.41280: . ack 109 win 5840 (DF) > > 09:39:25.793513 80.x.x.177.41280 > 62.x.x.217.http: . ack 5841 win 0 > > ..................... > > That's clearly a NOC spoofing proxy which improves performance over > satellite, especially in the presence of non-congestive packet loss. BTW, does anybody know if such a proxy is available in open-source? I've been searching google for a while, nothing found, that seems quite unreal. > > And this is the tunnel one: > > [root@ve0 root]# tcpdump -i tun0 -n port http > > tcpdump: listening on tun0 > This is too short. Please send me the complete dump privately or > put it up on the web. You can see full logs here: Direct transfer: http://www.vtx.ru/no_tunnel.txt OpenVPN transfer: http://www.vtx.ru/tunnel.txt > > My end runs at linux 2.4.27. Server end runs the same system currently, but > > I've tried another server wich I have access to, it runs linux 2.4.20 or so. > > OK, I suspect packet loss might be playing a role here. The complete > dump should tell us what the problem is. Ok, thanks a lot! -- vlad - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
