Re: ArcNet and 2.6.8.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 18:52, Esben Nielsen wrote:
> Oh well, I'll try to see if I can get time to make it stable with
> preemption on. Is preemption safe enough to ensure SMP safe or would I
> have to test on at least a hyperthreading machine as well?
> 

In theory preempt safe should be SMP safe, but in practice it doesn't
always work this way.  You need to test on an actual SMP system.

I am not sure that HT == SMP for your purposes either.  ISTR some cases
with the VP patches where it broke on HT but not "real" SMP.

Lee

-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux